A Federal Court of Canada decision that Amazon’s “one-click” method of doing business could be patentable will be appealed to the Federal Court of Appeal. Let us hope that sanity prevails. The patent application will be re-examined. Let us hope that the examiner does a more thorough job of showing how silly patenting methods can be. There is no difference between a method of doing business and a mathematical expression. It is a method of processing information in Amazon’s case, abstract and not patentable. If you can patent method A and method B. Is method A+B patentable? What about A-B? Wake up, commissioner!

17501
12787
206
3
2
23952
11874
11726
4651
4277
1642
198
14
2
1
0
0
When all you are is a patent examiner, all the world is a patent.