Archive for February 1st, 2010

Doing the Maths

HP has been a favourite company of mine for decades. In nuclear physics they made nearly indestructible power supplies, high-precision lab electronics and then computers. Now, I read on their site the usual stuff about recommending that other OS. Now, they trumpet “Do the Math”, recommending business adopt “7″ on new PCs to lower costs.

I can do the maths:

  • it costs almost nothing to run GNU/Linux on the old machines – if they die, chuck them and use new thin clients at less than half the price of HP thin clients
  • of course folks spending a ton of money keeping that other OS running may see “7″ on new as an option but they have far better options

HP knows about thin clients? They are the leading supplier. They know you can run them very nicely with GNU/Linux, yet they recommend that other OS. Does GM recommend Cadillacs? No. They make them for people who want an expensive car. It is silly to recommend the most expensive line for every customer. There may be some customers of HP for whom “7″ on new machines is the best choice but they must be in the minority or “7″ would be doing a lot more to pump up the PC industry. Instead “7″ is holding the PC industry back my putting a pricey roadblock on renewed IT.

This is the continuing soap-opera that is M$’s marketing schemes. They persuaded HP to put a damper on sales of GNU/Linux in 2002/2003 for a few shekels. When is HP going to learn that they should be working for themselves and their customers, not M$? The same could be asked of ASUS, MSI, Dell, and others who know there is a good market for GNU/Linux but they hold it back at M$’s behest. I think 2010 will end this nonsense. It’s about time.

More maths:

  • $100 thin client
  • $125 monitor
  • $25 keyboard and optical mouse
  • $25 worth of a good server

$275. That’s all the hardware will cost to put a good thin client seat on your LAN. The box could last you ten years, the monitor almost as long. Why are you spending $1000 per year per seat running that other OS on thick clients? You can add software for every client in seconds. You will rarely need to reboot. Students, secretaries, salespeople can move around and log into their sessions without losing their page. One person can manage thousands of seats. The secretary can plug in a new thin client/keyboard/mouse if one should fail. Why continue to bleed money for IT when there is much more that can be done for much less? Do the maths, please!

Stop recommending and accepting the recommendation of “7″ on new and shop around. You can find people who do not “recommend “7″”: IBM, RedHat, Novell, and hordes of others. Get off the wintel treadmill.

- Robert Pogson

Let the Market Decide…

The trolls and astroturfers are fond of saying GNU/Linux cannot cut it in the market and that customers demand that other OS. Here is proof to the contrary. In 2002, HP was selling 3% of their PCs with GNU/Linux, particularly to white-box OEMs. M$ persuaded them to stop that by offering $30 per PC incentive. Did they let the market decide? Nope. They cut out choice for the consumer for selfish reasons.

South East Asia. HP discontinued its Linux SKUs beginning on November 18th. This is based on joint marketing effort that spans six months to promote low cost Windows SKU’s with $30 extra channel incentives that focus on white box resellers. The goal is to enable the whitebox resellers to offer HP branded PCs instead of naked PCs.

HP ships today ~20k Linux per month World Wide vs 10k six months ago. We estimate HP will ship up to 45k Linux a month Summer 03 – 3% of HP’s overall PC volume. The growth is generated by a world wide effort to target White Box volume which mainly ship without legal OS. HP has in the last 6 months created Linux Desktop PC sku’s in 20+ new countries across all regions, including most recently the US.”

These are from Comes v M$ documents published on Groklaw. see TFA.

Again, I claim that if their product were superior, M$ would not have to pay people to push it.  GNU/Linux was doing very well back then, 3% of HPs PCs, but a campaign by M$ to block production held it back. HP was enjoying 100% per annum growth in the GNU/Linux shipments. Isn’t that acceptance by the market? Isn’t that what the customer wants? So, here we are six years later and these trolls still claim GNU/Linux is on only 1% of PCs. Liars.

In the long run, it will not matter. GNU/Linux will have its share and that other OS will not have a monopoly. The delays M$ has induced have been a theft of billions of dollars per year for half a decade. It could be the crime of the century except evil has no limits. People, wake up! M$ is using the money you pay them to preserve monopoly and high prices. Stop showering M$ with money.

- Robert Pogson



Archives by Month

My Mission

My observations and opinions about IT are based on 40 years of use in science and technology and lately, in education. I like IT that is fast, cost-effective and reliable. I do not care whether my solution is the same as yours. I like to think for myself.

My first use of GNU/Linux in 2001 was so remarkably better than what I had been using, I feel it is important work to share GNU/Linux with the world. I have been blessed by working in schools where students and school systems have benefited by good, modular software easily installed in most systems.

I have shown GNU/Linux to thousands of students and hundreds of teachers over the years and will continue in some way doing that until I die in spite of the opposition.

Posts

February 2010
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28