The Government of Canada has been lukewarm to FLOSS. A recent RFI could be a change. Parts of the RFI are very awkward, like lumping FLOSS in with NO CHARGE LICENSED SOFTWARE. How awkward is that? I suggested, in my submission, that they split their universe into Free and non-Free because that makes sense. No-charge licences for non-free software like IE can be loaded with security and anti-competitive burdens that FLOSS does not impose. I proposed that the Government of Canada prefer FLOSS rather than look upon it as something to be very cautious about. Why fear openness? Here is my submission:
rfi_floss_gc

8671
8549
96
2
0
12276
5572
5535
3530
1570
1425
189
0
0
0
0
0